2017-02-27, 20:51 | #1 |
C12 Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 473
|
C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Vadso City Draft Deployment / City Defense: https://docs.google.com/presentation...it?usp=sharing
Saaremaa Scrimmage Deployment: https://docs.google.com/presentation...it?usp=sharing
__________________
|
2017-02-27, 21:30 | #2 |
Tournament Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Liverpool laa
Posts: 255
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 07:26 | #3 |
Lead Admin / Retired EMC CO
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wiesbaden
Posts: 2,369
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 19:46 | #4 | |
Retired PELA/CATA CO
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,810
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Thank you for sharing.
In relation to the first battle on Xiangshan, I hope it is okay asking a few questions to the EMC battle-plan, Route 2 RED. From the very start, the plan make the following statement: Quote:
But what I dont understand, are the reasons behind the decision, to go for the attack anyhow? Also, when the surprise attack was launched, what made you decide, not to reinforce the harassment force in and around the Blue Box? Fog of war? What happened? Again, I hope it is okay to ask these questions. Please accept my apology, should it not be the case.
__________________
Speed Surprise Strength 500 million combat boots... One heartbeat
|
|
2017-02-28, 21:22 | #5 |
Lead Admin / Retired EMC CO
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wiesbaden
Posts: 2,369
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
The attack was mostly motivated by everyone being insanely bored after the very slow first hour. Also, we were aware that we had a ticket deficit, and a successful push to a new good position (such as PLA outpost and the riverline are) usually means a big ticket gain (bc of squadwipes).
Blue box was planned as a simple AT hunter place, to kill damaged vehicles that try to RTB. It soon showed that APN was happily commiting way too many people there, our few recon guys drawing much more APN manpower than it warranted. So we kept recon there, drawing forces off the frontline, making it much easier to brute-force our assault on the front with superior numbers.
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 22:33 | #6 |
Task Force Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gothenburg
Posts: 625
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Heyho! So who did all the work on your BPs on APN? And would be super interesting to take a look at em all.
In EMC is was mostly me making them with a lot of help/input from senshi and timings from our Intel department. I Also saved up most of the BPs in c11 which helped me at the start but in the end I mostly made our BPsfrom scrath. I usually prioritised making them simple and tried making as few slides as possible.
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 23:16 | #7 |
C12 Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 473
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
YTMan has the rest of the documents, whenever he shows up. I think he's still too sad to come back online here.
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 23:30 | #8 | |
Retired PELA/CATA CO
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,810
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Boredom became decisive. Yes, that first hour was quite static. And here I thought you deliberately had planned, to slow down the pace of battle, in order to strengthen your surprise attack later on.
I just watched your great offensive move again. I forgot that squad 8 did in fact, draw in a good portion of the APN force. Frontliner even got an FOB. Quote:
Fisen, if you also made the battle-plan for Xiangshan, please allow me to congratulate you on that surprise attack. That move will be what I will remember Campaign 12 for. True organised Audacity.
__________________
Speed Surprise Strength 500 million combat boots... One heartbeat
|
|
2017-02-28, 23:34 | #9 |
Tournament Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Liverpool laa
Posts: 255
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Xiangshan was nothing compared to Wanda and Vadso m8
__________________
|
2017-02-28, 23:36 | #10 |
C12 Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 433
|
Re: C12 Intel/Battleplan Sharing Thread
Wanda was pretty sweet, probably the closest match in C12. Vadso however was just spam 4 inf squads to get the southern hill, build a TOW, GG.
|
Tags |
c12, intel or battleplan, sharing, thread |
|
|